NEWS ARTICLES NEWS ARTICLES

Title: The SOLUTION for Preventing Future School Shootings, and WHY the Newtown Shooting Happened.
Author: Andrew M Molchan
Date: Wed December 19th, 2012

 

Dec. 19th 2012. ANDY'S UNPOPULAR OPINIONS. A World Expert on Firearms Crime and Gun Control Comments on the Current School Shooting Problem.

There was a time when I, Andy Molchan, was the world's number one expert on firearms and crime in America. Some other people didn't believe that, including many in the firearms industry. That's because their views were small minded and naive, and my views were to grand strategy advanced for their mindset. I'm not boasting, those were the facts.

Historical fact, I was the person who in 1975 discovered the only know corollary to the American murder rate. That was the M2 cash level of cash in circulation in society. During the 1930's when cash circulation went down the Murder rate also went way down. The gun-murder corollary is a reverse. The places that had total bans on civilian ownership of guns, like Washington DC, had the highest murder rates.

If I had been an ass kisser, and told people what they wanted to hear rather than what they needed to hear; I would have gone a lot further in the gun industry (or any industry) than I did by telling everyone the usually unwanted truth.

I finished my Army tour, came back to America, and went into the American arms industry in 1968. In 1968, and for many years, the majority of thinking about firearms and firearms misuse WITHIN the firearms industry was mainly at the Elmer Fudd, and Johnny Carson's Floyd R Turbo level.

In 1968, the 1968 Gun Control Act had just been passed and MANY company presidents within the gun industry thought it was, "All Over." At the time I said, "No, it's just started."

I WAS one of a small group of people  (that included my good friend Neal Knox), the group that brought some degree of sophistication to the thinking within the firearms industry. It was mainly Neal Knox and Harlan Carter in their 1977 Coup d'etat that saved the NRA from its Elmer Fudd defeatist wing. The New and saved NRA eventually provided the firepower that eventually won the war.

The Bottom Line is that my side WON. After 32 years of hard fighting WE WON with the Supreme Court 2010 ruling that the 2nd Amendment means what it says. I was NOT General Westmoreland, we lost lots of battles, but won the war.

Today, I read the newspapers and see the same old shallow thinking. There's a lot of Floyd R Turbo thinking today, but this time it's mainly on the big media's side of the table. I see lots of "tactical information" about how much sales have go up for Smith & Wesson, and Ruger, and how Cerberus would like to sell their gun companies now that they've made a good profit, etc.

As an expert in this field, I would describe 95% of that's in the current news stories about firearms and crime as, "True, accurate, and NOT relevant." For me it's, "Sawdust Journalism." It's Journalism for people with a "Friends" or "Seinfeld" mindset.

In all honesty, you have to sell Newspapers and nobody knows better than I that most people DO NOT want the truth.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "Why were there ZERO school shootings in America 200 years ago? 150 years ago? 100 years ago? 50 years ago? Why only NOW in the last dozen years? What has changed in the last 25 years that was NEVER in America before?"

The answer is definitely NOT firearms. 150 years ago there were MORE firearms per capita at that time then now, but ZERO school shooting, and as far as I know there were no mass shootings anywhere in America. Even the Post Office was safe.

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "The CORE Question that Nobody is asking except me is, WHY ONLY WHITE MALES who shoot up schools? The FACT that's it's only White Males (with one Asian American who thought of himself as White), the FACT that it's only White males IS CORE TO THE SOLUTION."

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "Many nations have a lot of guns. Most Swiss households in Switzerland have fully automatic machine guns that can shoot 600 rounds a minute. Germany has a lot of guns. HOWEVER, nobody in Switzerland or Germany is shooting up schools, or anything else. WHY in America, but NOT in Switzerland?"

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "If GUNS are the problem as so many in America believe. If guns kill people rather than people killing people as tens of millions of Americans believe. Than that means before the invention of firearms there were no wars and no mass killings. Right?"

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "If Guns are 100% bad as so many say, then why do America's police carry something that's 100% bad. Why has the American Government given LOTS OF GUNS to the Iraqis and Afghanistanis if guns are all bad?"

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "If there are 400 million guns in American now, and 65 million gun owners MOST of whom have said they are NOT giving up their guns no matter what laws are passed. And we have the Supreme Court's 2nd Amendment pro-FIREARMS ownership ruling. Then isn't any talk of protecting schools by taking guns OUT of America TOTAL INSANITY?"

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "Can modern America solve ANY OF ITS PROBLEMS if the 'TRUTH' is defined as ONLY the politically correct truth, and NOT the unwanted real Truth?"

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "Is modern America capable of doing ONLY WHAT ARE PROVEN FAILURES?" The media is full of "high capacity magazine ban" talk. THAT'S A PROVEN FAILURE. Let me say that again - A PROVEN FAILURE. It's all rancid tactics and ZERO grand strategy thought. Firearms experts know that if Adam Lanza had been using a shotgun rather than an AR15 he probably have killed MORE people. An eight shot shotgun loaded with Buck Shot is a de facto machine gun at under 80 feet. If Adam Lanza had been using a shotgun rather than an AR15 he would have WITHOUT QUESTION wounded more people, and probably killed more people.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "THE CORE QUESTION IS NOT what kind of a gun the White males who have been driven crazy are using. The Core Question is WHY and WHAT is driving American White males crazy? What has driven White males to the point where they so DESPISE THEIR SCHOOL all they want to do is go there and kill everyone?"

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "Rather than keep doing Proven Failures over and over. Rather than making proven failures bigger and bigger. Why don't we do something totally New? Something that's totally different? Something that's a total Change? Why don't we arm those teachers who want to be armed? Why don't we give them legal protection? Why don't we apply the armed airline pilot solution to schools? It's the SAME argument that worked for pilots. If the teachers are armed than the school ALWAYS has protection."

THE NEEDED QUESTIONS: We need to ask, "If we want to ban something, why don't we ban Black History month that's an insult to White males, and is a factor in driving White males crazy. If we don't ban Black History month, then let's ADD a White Male History Month. Isn't any kind of month for a particular race RACISM by definition?"

Since 1999 I've been giving the CORRECT ANSWER to the above question, but nobody in the politically correct media wants to hear it because it's NOT the answer they want to hear.

BOTTOM LINE. It's a horrible problem for BOTH White and Black Males. White males kill people in their school, Black males kill each other. The Core, CORE problem is that current American schools have gone from being teaching places to being propaganda factories. The unwanted truth is that a lot of teachers become teachers so they can be propagandists with a left-wing agenda. This is the main reason why American test scores compared to the World keep GOING DOWN. Too many American teachers do NOT care about teaching: reading, or writing, or science, etc., all they want to be are propagandists. It's a total systemic problem that goes all the way to the top managers of America's schools.

Part of a Solution would be to pass Federal Laws, and State Laws, Separating Teaching and Political/Social agendas. Isn't a "Black History Month" racist by definition?  If you want to be a preacher for reverse racism, then get a tent, DON'T become a teacher.

There MUST be Real Change, and America's schools must STOP being reverse racist factories. Without real change, periodically some White male will become so incensed with this school's Bullshit the only thing he'll want to do is kill everyone in his school.  

Prediction: America will NOT change, and school shootings WILL happen again.

PERMISSION TO REPRINT.  Send a copy of this essay to your local newspaper, Governor, and Congressman.

Permission to Reprint, is given to reprint, and/or quote, any of Andrew M Molchan's  1,755 essays and stories he has written over the last 40 years, including this current essay.  

 

 

 




 
           
  Copyright © 2008 - All rights reserved